<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Technorama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama</link>
	<description>Take a light hearted look at the world of tech, science, and sci-fi. Special interviews with industry notables. Feed Your Inner Geek!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:34:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on CCT#255: No Joke Left Behind &#8211; 206.222.2428 by Alexis Duran (ADdude)</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2010/03/10/cct255-no-joke-left-behind-206-222-2428/comment-page-1/#comment-40947</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis Duran (ADdude)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1798#comment-40947</guid>
		<description>Ok,Chuck this weeks theme was Science Fiction Stars like William Shatner,David Tennat,Masi Oka,Robbie the Robot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok,Chuck this weeks theme was Science Fiction Stars like William Shatner,David Tennat,Masi Oka,Robbie the Robot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caption This Photo by Kathi</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2010/02/27/caption-this-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40942</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1780#comment-40942</guid>
		<description>I CALL INTERTUBEZ ADDICTION! INNERVENSHUN TIME FOR U!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I CALL INTERTUBEZ ADDICTION! INNERVENSHUN TIME FOR U!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CCT#254: RPG Pride! &#8211; 206.222.2428 by Alexis Duran (ADdude)</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2010/03/03/cct254-rpg-pride-206-222-2428/comment-page-1/#comment-40929</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis Duran (ADdude)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1794#comment-40929</guid>
		<description>Chuck the theme was time travelers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck the theme was time travelers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caption This Photo by Shari</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2010/02/27/caption-this-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40928</link>
		<dc:creator>Shari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1780#comment-40928</guid>
		<description>Oahi!  I iz rebutting ur computurz fer u!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oahi!  I iz rebutting ur computurz fer u!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caption This Photo by Mad Marv</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2010/02/27/caption-this-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40919</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Marv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1780#comment-40919</guid>
		<description>I can haz ATTENSHUN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can haz ATTENSHUN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caption This Photo by SkyJack</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2010/02/27/caption-this-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40918</link>
		<dc:creator>SkyJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1780#comment-40918</guid>
		<description>Bewitched in the 21st Century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bewitched in the 21st Century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caption This Photo by JTShea</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2010/02/27/caption-this-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-40917</link>
		<dc:creator>JTShea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1780#comment-40917</guid>
		<description>I can haz toasty butt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can haz toasty butt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Muppets: Beaker&#8217;s Ballad by Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2010/02/25/the-muppets-beakers-ballad/comment-page-1/#comment-40914</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1775#comment-40914</guid>
		<description>This is reminiscent of a Jerusalem District Court Decision re use of the word Colony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is reminiscent of a Jerusalem District Court Decision re use of the word Colony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Survey by CCT#252: Trust Us &#8211; 206.222.2428 &#124; Technorama</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/survey/comment-page-1/#comment-40881</link>
		<dc:creator>CCT#252: Trust Us &#8211; 206.222.2428 &#124; Technorama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?page_id=1722#comment-40881</guid>
		<description>[...] Survey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Survey [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CCT#251: Geeky Valentines &#8211; 206.222.2428 by Kim Gerald</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2010/02/12/cct251-geeky-valentines-206-222-2428/comment-page-1/#comment-40864</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Gerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1749#comment-40864</guid>
		<description>Hey! Happy Valentines Day everyone...                                Wish you all to have a very sweet moment with your loved ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! Happy Valentines Day everyone&#8230;                                Wish you all to have a very sweet moment with your loved ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tiny Ninjas unboxing the Nexus One by Kreg</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2010/01/24/tiny-ninjas-unboxing-the-nexus-one/comment-page-1/#comment-40784</link>
		<dc:creator>Kreg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1714#comment-40784</guid>
		<description>Yes it did Marv! I&#039;ll send them to your house next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it did Marv! I&#8217;ll send them to your house next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There&#8217;s a pocket for that&#8230; by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2010/01/13/theres-a-pocket-for-that/comment-page-1/#comment-40782</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1690#comment-40782</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s for real (not a spoof). Scottevest are very nice. After watching that video, I&#039;m very tempted to get one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s for real (not a spoof). Scottevest are very nice. After watching that video, I&#8217;m very tempted to get one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There&#8217;s a pocket for that&#8230; by Klaus @ TechPatio</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2010/01/13/theres-a-pocket-for-that/comment-page-1/#comment-40781</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaus @ TechPatio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1690#comment-40781</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t remember the last time I used an outdoor vest (if ever?), but I wouldn&#039;t mind if I could get one with that many pockets :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t remember the last time I used an outdoor vest (if ever?), but I wouldn&#8217;t mind if I could get one with that many pockets <img src='http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sir Patrick Stewart.  It will be so milord. by Alan Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2009/12/31/sir-patrick-stewart-it-will-be-so-milord/comment-page-1/#comment-40745</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1667#comment-40745</guid>
		<description>Of course, the newspapers (and the BBC) referred to Sir Pratrick as &quot;the Star Trek actor&quot; - and then mentioned that he told of how he was turned down for several roles because the producer / director &quot;did not want Jean-Luc Picard&quot;.

I&#039;m guessing he wasn&#039;t reading the papers yesterday. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the newspapers (and the BBC) referred to Sir Pratrick as &#8220;the Star Trek actor&#8221; &#8211; and then mentioned that he told of how he was turned down for several roles because the producer / director &#8220;did not want Jean-Luc Picard&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing he wasn&#8217;t reading the papers yesterday. <img src='http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s Enhance by Scott Gallatin</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2009/12/18/lets-enhance/comment-page-1/#comment-40724</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gallatin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1638#comment-40724</guid>
		<description>HAHAH!

Great clips. Except the pink panther one with Steve Martin. I hated that movie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAH!</p>
<p>Great clips. Except the pink panther one with Steve Martin. I hated that movie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My old Star Wars sheets just don&#8217;t compare. by Chuck Tomasi</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2009/12/14/my-old-star-wars-sheets-just-dont-compare/comment-page-1/#comment-40719</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Tomasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2009/12/14/my-old-star-wars-sheets-just-dont-compare/#comment-40719</guid>
		<description>And the &quot;accessories&quot; I wanted in 2009!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the &#8220;accessories&#8221; I wanted in 2009!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contact Us by Cujo</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/contact-us/comment-page-1/#comment-40688</link>
		<dc:creator>Cujo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/?page_id=4#comment-40688</guid>
		<description>Great show, guys. Keep it up.

I&#039;ve been wading through my podcast backlog and I&#039;ve been following the various keyboard discussions. A couple of comments for you...

The various international keyboard layouts originated with typewriters and not computers. As you said, they were created to help prevent jamming the typebars. Since different languages tend to have a different distribution of the letters, the keyboards tended to get reorganized by language. (You can see this distribution issue in foreign language Scrabble sets. eg: A Polish scrabble set has 5 Zs, K &amp; W are among the highest scoring letters in French and there are no Js or Ks in an Italian set)

There was a minor dig at Apple for using a &quot;non standard&quot; keyboard This is actually the &quot;standard&quot; that most computer terminals and computer equipment used prior to the IBM PC. Smith-Corona, Underwood, Remington, etc. all followed a similar layout in typwriters. It was the IBM Selectric that used the oddball layout which carried through to the IBM PC. You can still see the &quot;standard&quot; keyboard layout in the UK and on many other international english keyboards. This is a fine example of a short-lived IBM advertising campaign from the late 70&#039;s &quot;We don&#039;t follow standards, we make them&quot;. (or something to that effect)

101</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great show, guys. Keep it up.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been wading through my podcast backlog and I&#8217;ve been following the various keyboard discussions. A couple of comments for you&#8230;</p>
<p>The various international keyboard layouts originated with typewriters and not computers. As you said, they were created to help prevent jamming the typebars. Since different languages tend to have a different distribution of the letters, the keyboards tended to get reorganized by language. (You can see this distribution issue in foreign language Scrabble sets. eg: A Polish scrabble set has 5 Zs, K &amp; W are among the highest scoring letters in French and there are no Js or Ks in an Italian set)</p>
<p>There was a minor dig at Apple for using a &#8220;non standard&#8221; keyboard This is actually the &#8220;standard&#8221; that most computer terminals and computer equipment used prior to the IBM PC. Smith-Corona, Underwood, Remington, etc. all followed a similar layout in typwriters. It was the IBM Selectric that used the oddball layout which carried through to the IBM PC. You can still see the &#8220;standard&#8221; keyboard layout in the UK and on many other international english keyboards. This is a fine example of a short-lived IBM advertising campaign from the late 70&#8217;s &#8220;We don&#8217;t follow standards, we make them&#8221;. (or something to that effect)</p>
<p>101</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How many Stormtroopers does it take to takedown a turkey? by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2009/11/26/how-many-stormtroopers-does-it-take-to-takedown-a-turkey/comment-page-1/#comment-40619</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2009/11/26/how-many-stormtroopers-does-it-take-to-takedown-a-turkey/#comment-40619</guid>
		<description>This is not the turkey you are looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not the turkey you are looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Children&#8217;s toy inspires cheap way to produce high tech diagnostic chips by Scott Gallatin</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2009/11/13/childrens-toy-inspires-cheap-way-to-produce-high-tech-diagnostic-chips/comment-page-1/#comment-40520</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gallatin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1544#comment-40520</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s so cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s so cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hey Jude &#8211; the flowchart by Chuck Tomasi</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/2009/11/02/hey-jude-the-flowchart/comment-page-1/#comment-40466</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Tomasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/?p=1499#comment-40466</guid>
		<description>We need one more arrow from the top &quot;hey jude&quot; to the bottom &quot;na&quot; for the second half of the song. Looks like Rev 1.1 is needed. Better submit an ECO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need one more arrow from the top &#8220;hey jude&#8221; to the bottom &#8220;na&#8221; for the second half of the song. Looks like Rev 1.1 is needed. Better submit an ECO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
